Process mining
We read the real event log from your systems, not the diagram somebody drew in 2019. You get a map of where time and rework actually go, with volumes attached.
Service 01
Work that moves by copy‑paste is work a machine should have finished overnight. We map how a process actually runs, then automate it end to end — with an audit trail, and a human checkpoint where the money is.
The problem
Most companies do not have a process problem. They have twelve systems that were never introduced to each other, and people bridging the gaps by hand. An order arrives by email, gets typed into the ERP, is confirmed in a spreadsheet, and is chased on the phone when a customer asks.
That work is invisible on the org chart. It shows up as overtime, as a month‑end that takes four days, as a single person who cannot take holiday because only they know how the reconciliation runs. It is also, almost always, deterministic — which is exactly the kind of work software is good at.
What we install
We read the real event log from your systems, not the diagram somebody drew in 2019. You get a map of where time and rework actually go, with volumes attached.
Where systems have an interface, we integrate properly: queued, idempotent, restartable. Scheduled jobs that survive a failed night and pick up where they stopped.
Some screens have no API and never will. We drive those with robotic process automation, scoped to a service account and monitored like any other job.
The automation does the ninety percent that is routine and hands a human the ten percent that is not — with the context needed to decide, not just an error code.
Every action is logged with who, what, when, and which record. When a regulator or an auditor asks, the answer is a query rather than an archaeology project.
Payments, credit notes, anything irreversible: a person approves before it happens. Autonomy is earned per step, never assumed.
Where it fits
What you get
Questions
The first working automation is typically live within weeks, not quarters, because we scope one process rather than a programme. Discovery ends in a map you can read; the first deployment goes out behind a switch you control.
No. Replacing core systems to enable automation is usually the expensive way round. We integrate with what you run — through APIs where they exist, and RPA where they do not.
It retries, and if it still cannot proceed it stops and escalates with context rather than guessing. Every run is logged. Dead-lettered work waits for a human instead of disappearing.
RPA is one tool we use, not the whole approach. Driving a screen with a robot is a last resort for systems without an interface; where a real integration exists, we build that instead because it is faster and far less brittle.
Contact
Describe what runs today and who touches it. An engineer reads the brief, and we answer from Novi Sad within one business day.